Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Upholds Service Tax On Legal Fee Expense

CESTAT Upholds Service Tax On Legal Fee Expense

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the Service Tax amounting to Rs. 31800 on Legal Fee expense incurred by the appellant, Saisun Outsourcing Services during the period F.Y. 2016-17.

The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya Member (Technical) has observed that the appellant has shown Legal fees expense of Rs. 2,12,000/-in 2016-17. No submission was made by the appellant nor have they contested the applicability of Service Tax on the said expense. In absence of any reply or any supporting documents, Legal fees expenses incurred by the appellant are expenses towards Legal services.

The appellant/assessee was registered under Service Tax for providing services under Manpower Recruitment/Supply agency Services. The Commissioner also confirmed the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 31,800 in respect of legal & consultancy services under RCM under proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest. 

The appellant contended that service tax amounting to Rs. 31800 including Cess in respect of legal & Consultancy services under RCM should not be demanded and recovered from them under provisions of section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The Tribunal while dismissing the appeal, upheld the Service Tax on Legal Fee expense incurred by the assessee.

Case Details

Case Title: Saisun Outsourcing Services Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Goods, Service Tax, Jabalpur

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 54991 Of 2023

Date: 04.03.2025

Counsel For Appellant: None

Counsel For Respondent: Manoj Kumar

Read More: GST Dept. Issues Interest Recovery Notices For Delayed Outward Supply Declarations

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...