Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Reduces Redemption Fine On Re-Export Of Cocoa Beans

CESTAT Reduces Redemption Fine On Re-Export Of Cocoa Beans

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Banglore Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 5 Lakhs to Rs. 2 Lakhs on re-export of Cocoa Beans.

The bench of Pullela Nageswara Rao (Technical Member) has observed that on recall of the goods by the Authorised Officer and after the issue of the show cause notice, the Adjudicating Authority as per the request of the appellant permitted re-export of the impugned goods on payment of redemption fine and penalty.

The appellant/assessee imported ‘Cocoa Beans’ from Indonesia and filed 2 Bills of Entry along with the certificates of quality and test reports from the foreign suppliers indicating various characteristics along with grade limits. The test reports show that the imported ‘Cocoa Beans’ met the standards prescribed in Indonesia, which is “SNI 2323:2008 for Grade: I-B”. SNI is the Indonesian National standards for products, which are manufactured or imported into Indonesia. 

On import the Department issued an examination order directing to produce clearance under FSS Act or Regulations, or a no objection certificate (NOC) from the Authorized officer, FSSAI, Cochin.

The Authorized Officer subjected the Cocoa Beans to test under Clause 2.2 of the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011 and a further test was conducted under the category of ‘Dry Fruits and Nuts’ under Clause 2.3.47.5 of the Food Safety and Standards (Food Product Standards and Food Additives) Regulations 2011. 

The Test Report was issued that the ‘cocoa bean’ does not satisfy the specification of the approved standards. Contending that no standard has been fixed under FSS Act or Regulations for the ‘cocoa beans’, the only standard available is under BIS, the test report was challenged by the Appellant in Writ Petition No. 22987/2014 before the High Court of Kerala.

The Authorized officer informed the appellant for drawing samples from the premises of the appellant on 19.03.2015 in compliance of the Division Bench judgment of the High Court of Kerala. The Export Inspection Agency (EIA) issued Analysis Report and the opinion of the test report was the sample cocoa beans does not conform the requirement as laid down in “IS 8865:2003 for the above listed parameters.

Basing on the result of the EIA Test report the Authorised Officer issued a notice for recalling of all the products covered under the 4 Bills of entry on the ground that the samples do not conform to the requirements laid down in IS 8865:2003. 

Show Cause Notices were issued under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 by the Customs for the impugned imports. The Adjudicating Authority passed the impugned order dated 08.07.2015, confirmed the allegations made in both the Show Cause Notices and ordered confiscation of imported ‘Cocoa Beans’ and imposed redemption fine of Rs. 15,00,000 and penalty of Rs. 5,00,000.

The appellant has filed the appeal for waiver of fine and penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority, while allowing the re-export of the goods.

The tribunal held that the redemption fine and penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority could be considered for reduction. The redemption fine is reduced to Rs. 5,00,000 and penalty to Rs. 2,00,000.

Read More: “Problem Is Due To The Complexity Of GST System,” Says Madhya Pradesh Tax Law Bar Association and Commercial Tax Practitioners Association

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Mondelez India Foods Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs

Case No.: Customs Appeal No. 22140 of 2015

Date: 24.12.2024

Counsel For Appellant: Syed Peeran

Counsel For Respondent: Rajesh Shastry

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

More like this

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...