Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Ignored Suo-Motu EOU De-Bonding Clarification; Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Order...

CESTAT Ignored Suo-Motu EOU De-Bonding Clarification; Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Order And Remands Back

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT Ignored Suo-Motu EOU De-Bonding Clarification; Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Order And Remands Back

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has set aside a final order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) after holding that the Tribunal failed to consider a crucial clarification relating to the suo-motu de-bonding of a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU). The Court remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST Dues Omitted From Approved Insolvency Plan Can’t Be Revived: Calcutta High Court 

The Calcutta High Court has quashed an IGST demand and penalty totalling approximately ₹1.86...
Indirect Taxes

VAT Return Scrutiny Can’t Bypass 5 Year Limitation Or Mandatory Notice Requirement: Meghalaya High Court 

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed VAT scrutiny reports and notices covering tax periods...
Notification

GSTN Introduces Multistate Registration Facility to Apply Across States Under 1 PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a “Multistate Registration” facility on...
Columns

PAN Name Mismatch? TRACES Verification Can Help Before Tax Registration

Taxpayers and businesses preparing for Income Tax portal registration, TDS-related registration, GST registration, ICEGATE...

More like this

GST

GST Dues Omitted From Approved Insolvency Plan Can’t Be Revived: Calcutta High Court 

The Calcutta High Court has quashed an IGST demand and penalty totalling approximately ₹1.86...
Indirect Taxes

VAT Return Scrutiny Can’t Bypass 5 Year Limitation Or Mandatory Notice Requirement: Meghalaya High Court 

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed VAT scrutiny reports and notices covering tax periods...
Notification

GSTN Introduces Multistate Registration Facility to Apply Across States Under 1 PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a “Multistate Registration” facility on...