Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Appeal Pending Before CESTAT Since 1 Year: Karnataka High Court Directs...

Customs Appeal Pending Before CESTAT Since 1 Year: Karnataka High Court Directs Disposal Within 4 Months

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has directed the disposal of the customs appeal which was pending before Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) within 4 months.

The bench of Justice S.G.Pandit has observed that the customs appeal was pending for the last one year and the petitioner’s damaged goods would get destroyed.

The petitioner/assessee, M/S. Catasynth Speciality Chemicals Private Limited has prayed for a direction to the CESTAT, Bangalore to decide the appeal dated 10.01.2024 in a time bound manner.

The petitioner contended that it has filed appeal before the CESTAT against the order dated 10.10.2023 of the Commissioner of Customs and it is the grievance of the petitioner that the said appeal is pending for the last one year and petitioner’s damaged goods would get destroyed. Therefore, he prays for a direction to the CESTAT to dispose of the appeal in a time bound manner. 

The petitioner sought for interim direction to the respondents-department to release the damaged goods.

The department contended that in view of huge pendency, the CESTAT could not dispose of the appeal and prayed for six months time to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner.

The court held that it would be appropriate to direct the CESTAT to dispose of the appeal within four months. In the meanwhile, it is open for the petitioner to seek for any interim relief by filing separate application. 

Case Details

Case Title: M/S. Catasynth Speciality Chemicals Private Limited Versus Union Of India

Case No.: Writ Petition No. 3097 Of 2025 (T-Res)

Date: 13/02/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Abhishek A Rastogi

Counsel For Respondent: M.N. Kumar

Read More: Biometric Aadhaar Authentication & Document Verification for GST Registration in Assam: GSTN Issue Advisory

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...