Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCENVAT Credit Dispute: Vedanta Hit with Rs. 15.43 Lakh Penalty by GST...

CENVAT Credit Dispute: Vedanta Hit with Rs. 15.43 Lakh Penalty by GST Dept. 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Vedanta has been served with a penalty order amounting to Rs. 15.43 lakh by the Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise in Jharsuguda, Odisha. The action stems from alleged irregularities in the use of Central Value Added Tax (CENVAT) credits during the financial year 2016–17.

In a regulatory filing, Vedanta confirmed receipt of the order on July 23, stating that it pertains to the payment of Central Excise Duty in the said fiscal year. Along with the penalty, the Odisha tax authorities have also demanded the payment of the disputed tax amount and applicable interest.

The penalty order, dated June 19, will be contested by the company. Vedanta has announced its intent to appeal before the appropriate legal forum. “We are hopeful of a favourable verdict and do not foresee any material financial implications arising from the order,” the company stated.

History of Tax Disputes

This is not the first time Vedanta has found itself at odds with tax authorities. On May 21, 2025, the company received a penalty order worth ₹1.8 crore from the Coimbatore Commissioner of GST and Central Excise. That dispute revolved around the use of CENVAT credit for purchases made between February 2010 and March 2011.

Just days earlier, on May 16, a significantly larger penalty of ₹146 crore was issued by the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax in Visakhapatnam. That case involved the alleged non-payment of Special Additional Excise Duty related to Videocon share transactions.

Iron Ore Mining Expansion

Amid ongoing tax battles, Vedanta also announced a strategic win on the resource front. On July 23, the company revealed it had been declared the preferred bidder for the Janthakal Iron Ore Mine in Karnataka. The mine spans 71.16 hectares, and Vedanta is now working toward securing the necessary clearances and submitting the required Performance Bank Guarantee. Once these formalities are complete, the firm will receive a licence to commence mining operations.

The development aligns with Vedanta’s broader strategy to secure critical mineral resources and expand its presence in the Indian mining sector.

Read More: Muthoot Finance to Contest Rs. 1.52 Crore GST Demand from Kerala Tax Dept.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Foreign Currency Expenditure Alone Can’t Trigger Service Tax; Taxable Service Must Be Identified in SCN: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Integrated Mining Operations Can’t Be Taxed as Cargo Handling Service by Isolating Loading and Transportation: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Conflicting Views on Sub-Contractor’s Service Tax Liability Bar Extended Limitation: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Depreciation Allowable on Entire IPL Franchise Cost, Not Merely Annual Installment: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that depreciation on...

More like this

Foreign Currency Expenditure Alone Can’t Trigger Service Tax; Taxable Service Must Be Identified in SCN: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Integrated Mining Operations Can’t Be Taxed as Cargo Handling Service by Isolating Loading and Transportation: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Conflicting Views on Sub-Contractor’s Service Tax Liability Bar Extended Limitation: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...