Whether CCTV Mandate for Tobacco Units Exceeds Powers Under Central Excise Act? Allahabad High Court To Examines

HomeIndirect TaxesWhether CCTV Mandate for Tobacco Units Exceeds Powers Under Central Excise Act?...

Whether CCTV Mandate for Tobacco Units Exceeds Powers Under Central Excise Act? Allahabad High Court To Examines

Indirect Taxes

Published on

07/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Whether CCTV Mandate for Tobacco Units Exceeds Powers Under Central Excise Act? Allahabad High Court To Examines

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has raised serious constitutional and statutory concerns over the mandatory installation of CCTV cameras under the newly notified Chewing Tobacco, Jarda Scented Tobacco and Gutkha Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2026, granting interim protection to a tobacco manufacturer against coercive action. The bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Whether CCTV Mandate for Tobacco Units Exceeds Powers Under Central Excise Act? Allahabad High Court To Examines

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories