HomeIndirect TaxesCBIC Notifies Powers of Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax...

CBIC Notifies Powers of Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax For Passing Order In Respect Of DGGI Notices

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified powers of Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax for passing an order or decision in respect of notices issued by the officers of Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI).

The Board in the Central Government amended the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 02/2017-Central Tax, dated the 19th June, 2017.

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Central Tax namely Principal Commissioner Ahmedabad South, Principal Commissioner Bengaluru East, Principal Commissioner Bhopal, Principal Commissioner Bhubaneswar, Principal Commissioner Chandigarh, Commissioner Chennai South, Principal Commissioner Delhi North, Commissioner Delhi West, Commissioner Faridabad, Principal Commissioner Guwahati, Principal Commissioner Jaipur shall have power of passing an order or decision in respect of notices issued by the officers of Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence under sections 67, 73, 74, 76, 122, 125, 127, 129 and 130 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017.

Sections 67 deals with the power of inspection, search and seizure. Section 73 applies to any tax liability when there is no suspicion of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Section 74 applies to a tax liability only when there is a suspicion of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts.

Notification No. 27/2024-Central Tax

Date: 25/11/2024

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Agricultural Income Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Money Merely Due to Revised Computation: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

Mere Mismatch Between ‘Loan’ and ‘Purchase Advance’ Can’t Trigger S. 69A Addition or S. 263 Revision: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a revisionary...

Political Donation Can’t Be Treated as Bogus Without Proper Verification of Bank Transactions: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded a dispute...

Interest on Govt. Grant Funds Must Remain Part of Project Corpus, Not Taxable Income: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that interest...

More like this

Agricultural Income Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Money Merely Due to Revised Computation: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

Mere Mismatch Between ‘Loan’ and ‘Purchase Advance’ Can’t Trigger S. 69A Addition or S. 263 Revision: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a revisionary...

Political Donation Can’t Be Treated as Bogus Without Proper Verification of Bank Transactions: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded a dispute...