HomeIndirect TaxesCBIC Increases Monetary Limits For Filing Appeals By Dept. Before CESTAT, High...

CBIC Increases Monetary Limits For Filing Appeals By Dept. Before CESTAT, High Court and Supreme Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified the increase in the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department before Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate (CESTAT), High Court and Supreme Court in legacy Central Excise & Service Tax.

In exercise of powers conferred by section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to Service Tax, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has fixed the monetary limits which appeal shall not be filed in the CESTAT, High Court and Supreme Court.

The board has increased the monetary limit of CESTAT from Rs. 50 lakhs to Rs 60 Lakhs; high court from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 2 crores and in case of Supreme Court the monetary limit has been enhanced from Rs. 2 Crores to Rs. 5 Crores.

Adverse judgements should be contested irrespective of the amount involved.

Firstly, case where the constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule is under challenge.

Secondly, case where Notification/ Instruction / Order/ Circular has been held illegal or ultra vires.

Monetary Limits For Filing Appeals

Applicability of Circular Notifying Monetary Limits For Filing Appeals

The instruction applies only to legacy issues i.e., matters relating to Central Excise and Service Tax, and will apply to pending cases as well.

Relevant Provisions

Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 states that where, in pursuance of the orders or instructions or directions, issued under sub-section (1), the Central Excise Officer has not filed an appeal, application, revision or reference against any decision or order passed under the provisions of this Act, it shall not preclude such Central Excise Officer from filing appeal, application, revision or reference in any other case involving the same or similar issues or questions of law. 

Read More: Customs Tariff Act | CBIC Notifies New Definition Of ‘Laboratory Chemicals’

No appeal, application, revision or reference has been filed by the Central Excise Officer pursuant to the orders or instructions or directions issued under sub-section (1), no person, being a party in appeal, application, revision or reference shall contend that the Central Excise Officer has acquiesced in the decision on the disputed issue by not filing appeal, application, revision or reference.

The Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal or court hearing such appeal, application, revision or reference shall have regard to the circumstances under which appeal, application, revision or reference was not filed by the Central Excise Officer in pursuance of the orders or instructions or directions issued under sub-section (1).

FAQs

What is the monetary limit for filing appeal?

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified the increase in the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department before Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate (CESTAT), High Court and Supreme Court in legacy Central Excise & Service Tax.

Notification Details

CBIC-160390/20/2024

Read Notification

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CBIC Issues Transfer & Posting Order for Commissioners: 217 Officers Reassigned Across India

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified immediate transfers and...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 30, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 30, 2026.GSTGST PENALTY NOT SPECIFIED IN...

Can HC Reassess Guideline Value Under Article 227? Supreme Court Says No, Restores ₹1,000/sq. ft. Compensation

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court cannot reassess or substitute a...

Supreme Court Acquits Father-in-Law in Dowry Cruelty Case, Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Evidence

The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction of a father-in-law under Section 498A...

More like this

CBIC Issues Transfer & Posting Order for Commissioners: 217 Officers Reassigned Across India

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified immediate transfers and...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 30, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 30, 2026.GSTGST PENALTY NOT SPECIFIED IN...

Can HC Reassess Guideline Value Under Article 227? Supreme Court Says No, Restores ₹1,000/sq. ft. Compensation

The Supreme Court has held that a High Court cannot reassess or substitute a...