Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCBIC Constitutes 4 Interim Boards For Settlement Under Central Excise Act 

CBIC Constitutes 4 Interim Boards For Settlement Under Central Excise Act 

Indirect TaxesNotification

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Retired CBIC Officers Left Unrepresented in Arrears Case as Advocates Fail to Appear Despite Charging Heavy Fees; Govt Counsel Ready for Argument

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified the constitution of four Interim Boards for Settlement under Section 31A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The notification, numbered 02/2025-Central Excise (N.T.), was issued on April 8, 2025, and published under S.O. 1656(E). This move aims to streamline and expedite the resolution of long-pending central excise disputes across different regions of the country.

The Government has constituted four Interim Boards for Settlement.

Each board will be headquartered in a major metro city:

  • Interim Board for Settlement-I – Delhi
  • Interim Board for Settlement-II – Kolkata
  • Interim Board for Settlement-III – Mumbai
  • Interim Board for Settlement-IV – Chennai

These Boards will handle legacy issues and pending settlement applications under the Central Excise regime, which was subsumed by GST in July 2017.

Notification Details

Notification No. 02/2025-Central Excise (N.T.)

Date: 08/04/2025

Click Here To Read Notification

Read More: Repo Rate Cut Brings Relief for Home Loan Borrowers, Boosts Real Estate Sentiment

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...
Direct Tax

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...
Supreme Court

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...
Supreme Court

S. 106 Can’t Replace Proof of Guilt: Supreme Court Acquits Man in Kidnapping-Murder Case, Calls Investigation ‘Shoddy’

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted in a kidnapping and murder case...

More like this

Direct Tax

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...
Direct Tax

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...
Supreme Court

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...