Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesTelangana HC Grants Bail in NDPS Case Involving Alleged Marijuana Seizure at...

Telangana HC Grants Bail in NDPS Case Involving Alleged Marijuana Seizure at Hyderabad Airport

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The High Court for the State of Telangana has granted bail to a woman accused in a narcotics case involving the alleged seizure of 2.95 kilograms of suspected ganja/marijuana at the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, observing that the seized quantity was an “intermediate quantity” and that the material part of the investigation had already been completed. 

The bench of Justice Justice K. Sujana has observed that the material part of the investigation had already been completed. Taking into account the nature of allegations, stage of investigation, duration of incarceration and quantity allegedly seized, the Court found it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

According to the prosecution, the Air Intelligence Unit (AIU) of Customs at the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport suspected the petitioner, who was travelling from Bangkok to Hyderabad on a Thai Airlines flight on April 15, 2026, of carrying contraband substances. Acting on the suspicion, customs officers conducted a search in the presence of independent witnesses and allegedly recovered 2950 grams of substance suspected to be ganja/marijuana concealed in ten food packets placed inside a checked-in trolley bag. 

The petitioner argued before the Court that the accused was innocent and had been falsely implicated in the matter. It was further contended that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since April 17, 2026, and that the alleged seized quantity constituted only an intermediate quantity under the NDPS framework. The defence also submitted that the material portion of the investigation had already been completed, thereby justifying grant of bail. 

The prosecution contended that the allegations involved offences under the NDPS Act and therefore the petitioner was not entitled to bail. The prosecution also informed the Court that the investigation was still pending and emphasized that the contraband was allegedly brought from Bangkok to Hyderabad. 

After considering the rival submissions and examining the material available on record, the High Court noted that the petitioner had remained in custody since April 17, 2026, and that the seized contraband amounted to an intermediate quantity. 

The Court directed the petitioner to execute a personal bond of ₹25,000 along with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate. The petitioner was also directed to appear before the respondent authority every Wednesday at 11:00 a.m. for eight weeks or till filing of the charge sheet, whichever is earlier. Additionally, the Court directed compliance with the conditions stipulated under Section 437(3) of the CrPC, presently corresponding to Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Case Details

Case Title: Ms. Sejal Prashant Ambatkar Versus The Superintendent of Customs (Preventive)

Citation: JURISHOUR-1161-HC-2026(TEL) 

Case No.: Criminal Petition No.7186 Of 2026

Date:  06.05.2026

Read More: Jharkhand HC Quashes GST ITC Reversal Order Passed Solely Due to Delayed GSTR-3B Filing

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Pre-Regularisation Service Must Count for Pension; Employees Can Choose Old Pension Scheme: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that service rendered by employees on a contractual, ad...

No Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Without Proof of Pecuniary Advantage: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a public servant cannot be convicted under Section...

Related Eyewitnesses’ Testimony Requires Closer Scrutiny When It Bears ‘Ring of Falsity’: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted two persons convicted of murder after finding material discrepancies...

ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS – THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN NDPS INVESTIGATIONS

The Article "ONE CLOCK. DIFFERENT SUNSETS - THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME AND SEQUENCE IN...

More like this

Pre-Regularisation Service Must Count for Pension; Employees Can Choose Old Pension Scheme: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that service rendered by employees on a contractual, ad...

No Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Without Proof of Pecuniary Advantage: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a public servant cannot be convicted under Section...

Related Eyewitnesses’ Testimony Requires Closer Scrutiny When It Bears ‘Ring of Falsity’: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted two persons convicted of murder after finding material discrepancies...