Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesAssessment Proceedings Can’t Be Continued Against Legal Heir Of Deceased Assessee: CESTAT

Assessment Proceedings Can’t Be Continued Against Legal Heir Of Deceased Assessee: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi Bench has held that assessment proceedings cannot be continued against the legal heir of the deceased assessee.

The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that  the sole proprietor, Pushpa Mehta passed away soon after the issuance of the show cause notice while the adjudication proceedings were pending. In the circumstances, it was incumbent upon the Adjudicating Authority to have closed the proceedings as having abated. The order passed by the Adjudicating Authority is, therefore, void ab initio and, therefore, unsustainable.

The Show cause notice was issued to Ms. Pushpa Mehta, M/s. Mehta & Company, who were engaged in the manufacturing of water meters on job work basis. The activities were claimed to be exempt from the levy of service tax under Notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012. During the pendency of the adjudication proceedings, the sole proprietor passed away on 8.12.2018. 

A letter was submitted regarding the demise of the assessee. However, the Adjudicating Authority proceeded to pass the order-in-original dated 30.07.2019 confirming the demand for tax, interest and penalty, in the name of the deceased proprietor. 

The appeal filed by the appellant being the legal heir has been rejected by the impugned order for not making the mandatory pre-deposit and also that the appeal was not maintainable as the proprietor had passed away. 

The tribunal held that on the death of the sole proprietor the proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority stood abated and, therefore, the order-in-original is non-est. Consequently, the order is also not sustainable as the proceedings had already been lapsed. The demand is, therefore, set aside. 

Case Details

Case Title: Manish Mehta Versus Commissioner

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 50422 Of 2021

Date: 17.10.2025

Counsel For  Appellant: CA Kuldeep Lodha

Counsel For Respondent: AR Aejaz Ahmad

Read More: Advocate’s Presence During Interrogation By Police: SC Seeks Centre, States’ Response

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Without Addressing Taxpayer’s Grounds: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order concerning cancellation of GST...

More like this

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...