Customs Can’t Deny ASEAN AIFTA Preferential Duty Benefit Solely for Importer’s Inability to Answer Origin Questionnaire: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Can’t Deny ASEAN AIFTA Preferential Duty Benefit Solely for Importer’s Inability...

Customs Can’t Deny ASEAN AIFTA Preferential Duty Benefit Solely for Importer’s Inability to Answer Origin Questionnaire: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

30/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Customs Can’t Deny ASEAN AIFTA Preferential Duty Benefit Solely for Importer’s Inability to Answer Origin Questionnaire: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The New Delhi Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that preferential customs duty benefits under the ASEAN–India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA) cannot be denied merely because an importer is unable to furnish upstream manufacturing or raw material details beyond its knowledge, particularly when a valid Certificate of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
ASEAN AIFTA

Customs Can’t Deny ASEAN AIFTA Preferential Duty Benefit Solely for Importer’s Inability to Answer Origin Questionnaire: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

Maintenance to Qualified Wife Denied: Allahabad High Court [READ ORDER]

Delay Must Be Examined Considering Wrong Service of Order: CESTAT Remands BHEL’s Excise Refund Appeal

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

Mere Deposit in Electronic Ledger Not GST Payment: Andhra Pradesh HC Quashes Composite Order

More like this

Maintenance to Qualified Wife Denied: Allahabad High Court [READ ORDER]

Delay Must Be Examined Considering Wrong Service of Order: CESTAT Remands BHEL’s Excise Refund Appeal

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

About us

Company

Categories