Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCBIC Appoints Common Adjudicating Authority in Customs Show Cause Matters

CBIC Appoints Common Adjudicating Authority in Customs Show Cause Matters

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued Notification, to streamline adjudication in specific show cause proceedings. 

As per the official table attached to the notification, M/s Aardwolf Material Handling Pvt. Ltd. is the noticee in two separate show cause matters. The first relates to Show Cause Notice No. 493/2024 dated 16.05.2024 (subsequently amended by corrigendum no. 2374/2024 dated 27.07.2024), originally assigned to the Deputy Commissioner, ICD Whitefield, Bengaluru. The second, Show Cause Notice No. 583/2024 dated 15.06.2024, was under the jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner, ICD Concor, Kanakpura, Jaipur.

To ensure consistency and efficiency in adjudication, CBIC has appointed the Deputy Commissioner at ICD Whitefield, Bengaluru as the Common Adjudicating Authority for both cases.

The notification has been issued under Section 5 of the Customs Act, read with Sections 3 and 4, enabling the Board to confer powers on customs officers and reassign adjudicatory responsibilities.

This move is aimed at improving coordination and avoiding multiplicity of proceedings in complex or interconnected cases.

Notification Details

Notification No. 22/2025-Customs (N.T.)

Date: 07/04/2025

Read More: No Change in Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Areca Nuts: CBIC 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Incomplete E-Bike Kits Classifiable As Complete Vehicles, But Not Eligible For CKD Duty Concession: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Wrong Death Date In Official Certificate Does Not Establish Cheating Or Forgery: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case 

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman accused of furnishing an...

State Must Be Made Party Before Courts Impose Financial Liability; ₹10 Lakh Relief Granted To Retired Lecturer: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that impleading a government officer cannot substitute for formally...

Same GST Rate On Main Input And Output Can’t By Itself Bar Inverted Duty Refund: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that an...

More like this

Incomplete E-Bike Kits Classifiable As Complete Vehicles, But Not Eligible For CKD Duty Concession: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Wrong Death Date In Official Certificate Does Not Establish Cheating Or Forgery: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case 

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman accused of furnishing an...

State Must Be Made Party Before Courts Impose Financial Liability; ₹10 Lakh Relief Granted To Retired Lecturer: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that impleading a government officer cannot substitute for formally...