Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesAdda Fees Collected at Bus Terminal Not Taxable as ‘Business Support Service’:...

Adda Fees Collected at Bus Terminal Not Taxable as ‘Business Support Service’: CESTAT Chandigarh

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Adda Fees Collected at Bus Terminal Not Taxable as ‘Business Support Service’: CESTAT Chandigarh

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that adda fees collected at the Amritsar bus terminal cannot be taxed as ‘Business Support Services’ under the Finance Act, 1994. The bench of S. S. Garg (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical  Member) ruled that the infrastructure developer was…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Mere Invoices, Cheque Payments Insufficient to Establish Genuine Movement of Goods: GSTAT Restores Rs. 43.44 Lakh ITC Demand

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has restored a demand...
Company & PMLA

Former Income Tax Assistant Commissioner’s Disproportionate Assets Case Doesn’t Require Separate Bribery Allegation, Can Attract PMLA: Appellate Tribunal

The Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act has held that an...
Company & PMLA

Owner’s Knowledge of Share Allotment and Buyback Rules Out Benami Transaction U/s 2(9)(C): SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal

The Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act...
Company & PMLA

PMLA Attachment Can’t Survive After Scheduled Offences Cease to Exist: SAFEMA Tribunal

The Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act...

More like this

GST

Mere Invoices, Cheque Payments Insufficient to Establish Genuine Movement of Goods: GSTAT Restores Rs. 43.44 Lakh ITC Demand

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has restored a demand...
Company & PMLA

Former Income Tax Assistant Commissioner’s Disproportionate Assets Case Doesn’t Require Separate Bribery Allegation, Can Attract PMLA: Appellate Tribunal

The Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act has held that an...
Company & PMLA

Owner’s Knowledge of Share Allotment and Buyback Rules Out Benami Transaction U/s 2(9)(C): SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal

The Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act...