Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect Taxes9 Year Delay in Adjudicating SCN Violates S. 73(4B) Of Finance Act,...

9 Year Delay in Adjudicating SCN Violates S. 73(4B) Of Finance Act, 1994: Rajasthan High Court

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
9 Year Delay in Adjudicating SCN Violates S. 73(4B) Of Finance Act, 1994: Rajasthan High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a common adjudication order raising service tax demands of over Rs. 2.89 crore against a Udaipur-based firm, holding that revival of show cause notices after nearly nine years is arbitrary and contrary to Section 73(4B) of the Finance Act, 1994. The bench of Justice Arun Monga and Justice…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

S. 129(3) 7 Day Limit Mandatory For Passing Penalty Order: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that the...
GST

Delayed S. 129(3) Order Void Ab Initio: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has allowed an appeal...
GST

Clerical Error in GSTR-3B Can’t Deny Refund of Excess IGST Paid on Exports:  GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that a...
GST

Value of Principal’s Goods Not to Be Included in E-Way Bill on Return from Job Work: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that when...

More like this

GST

S. 129(3) 7 Day Limit Mandatory For Passing Penalty Order: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has held that the...
GST

Delayed S. 129(3) Order Void Ab Initio: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ernakulam Bench, has allowed an appeal...
GST

Clerical Error in GSTR-3B Can’t Deny Refund of Excess IGST Paid on Exports:  GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram Bench, has held that a...