Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect Taxes1610 Days Delay In Filing Appeal Condoned On Payment Of 5 Lakhs...

1610 Days Delay In Filing Appeal Condoned On Payment Of 5 Lakhs Cost To Customs Commissioner: Delhi High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has condoned the delay of 1610 days in filing the customs appeal subject to the payment of the cost of Rs. 5 Lakhs to customs commissioner.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has restored the appeal to its original position before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) subject to the payment of Rs. 5 lakhs shall be deposited with the Department by 10th July, 2025.

An investigation was conducted against the Appellant Company/assessee and its Directors on the grounds of allegations that certain goods were exported by them which were highly overvalued, only with the intention to earn duty drawbacks.

A Show Cause Notice was issued upon the Appellant Company by the Additional Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise, Delhi-IV, Faridabad and a detailed reply was filed. The Order was passed and was further challenged by the Appellant along with the Department before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals).

The Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) upheld the Order. It was held that the goods were exported by the Appellant company under fraudulent duty drawback claims, rejecting 365 shipping bills and rendering them liable for confiscation under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962. 

The matter was partially remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh determination of penalties under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962. 

Read More: New GST Registration Rules For 2025: No More Harassment or Delays—Here’s What You Need to Know

In the meantime, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) also initiated an investigation against the Appellant along with the ongoing investigation by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI).

The assessee that the Director of the Appellant Company was arrested on 25th September, 2021 and he subsequently faced various medical issues due to which his health condition is stated to have deteriorated.

The Order-in-Appeal No. dated 28th May, 2019, passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) was challenged by the Appellant before the CESTAT. The said appeal was filed after the COVID-19 pandemic, only on 29th January, 2024. Thus, there was a substantial delay in the filing of the appeal of more than 1610 days. 

The CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant holding that the Appellant had failed to satisfactorily explain the delay of 1617 days.

The court condoned the delay subject to stringent terms and conditions.

Firstly, the Appellant shall deposit a sum of Rs.5 lakhs as costs with the Respondent- Department.

Secondly, no unnecessary adjournments shall be taken before CESTAT.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S DURGA APPARELS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Case No.: CUSAA 80/2025 & CM APPL. 28264/2025, 28265/2025, 28266/2025, 28267/2025

Date: 09th May, 2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K. Seth, Ms. Palak Mathur and Mr. Varun Phore

Counsel For Respondent: Mr. Aakarsh Srivastava, SSC with Ms. Anugya Gupta

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...

CBDT Revises Valuer and Income-tax Practitioner Forms, Extends Key Deadlines

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the Income-tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules,...

More like this

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...