Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTWrit on Refund of Unconstitutional GST Levy on Ocean Freight Admitted: Bombay...

Writ on Refund of Unconstitutional GST Levy on Ocean Freight Admitted: Bombay High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court has admitted on refund of unconstitutional GST levy on ocean freight.

The bench of Justice Anil L.Pansare and Justice Siddheshwar S.Thombre has admitted our writ petition challenging the denial of refund on account of limitation in respect of GST paid under RCM on the deemed ocean freight component in CIF contracts.

The bench noted that while the levy itself was already held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Mohit Minerals, taxpayers are still being denied refunds of such amounts merely on the ground of limitation and unjust enrichment. The petition sought to address this critical issue and ensure that taxpayers are not unjustly deprived of refunds of taxes that were never constitutionally payable.

The petitioners/assessee, who had paid the GST for the years 2018-19, the tax was imposed for services rendered. The petitioner submitted that the petitioner had imported certain goods on Cost, Insurance and Freight [CIF] basis. As such where the goods are supplied, the tax liability is borne by the supplier but the supplier is from foreign country. The Central Government and the State Government issued notifications directing the importer to pay GST on reverse charge. 

The petitioner submitted the notifications across the country. The Gujarat High Court declared the notification as unconstitutional. The Central Government approached the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1390 of 2022 (Union of India Vs. Mohit Minerals Private Limited). 

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and thus upheld the order passed by the Gujarat High Court declaring both the notifications as ultra virus.

The court has held that since the order declaring notifications ultra virus attained finality, the petitioner approached the respondent for refund of tax paid by it. The request has been refused mainly on the ground of limitation. 

Case Details

Case Title: Patanjali Foods Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax Wadi 

Case No.:  Writ Petition NO.5514/2025

Date: 19/09/2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Abhishek Naik, Advocate

Counsel For Respondent:  K.R.Lule, AGP

Read More: Govt Eases Packaging Compliance Rules Amid GST Rate Revision

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred Where Delay Occurred Beyond Taxpayer’s Control: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has directed the GST Appellate Authority to entertain an appeal...

Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Trace Gutka Machinery Removed After DGGI Seizure: Punjab and Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to a person accused...

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...

Dept. Can’t Apply Different Yardsticks in Identical Tax Cases: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 21.92 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a departmental appeal challenging the setting aside of...

More like this

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred Where Delay Occurred Beyond Taxpayer’s Control: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has directed the GST Appellate Authority to entertain an appeal...

Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Trace Gutka Machinery Removed After DGGI Seizure: Punjab and Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to a person accused...

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...