Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTUnregistered Vegetable Vendor Slapped with Rs. 29 Lakh GST Demand over UPI...

Unregistered Vegetable Vendor Slapped with Rs. 29 Lakh GST Demand over UPI Transactions

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

UPI Transactions/digital payments land small vendor in regulatory trouble

A small-time vegetable vendor, Shankargouda Hadimani in Haveri has found himself at the center of a tax controversy after receiving a Rs. 29 lakh demand notice from Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities for non-compliance with GST regulations.

Shankargouda Hadimani, who has been running a modest vegetable shop near the Municipal High School grounds for the past four years, was issued the notice for conducting business without GST registration. Officials claim that Hadimani’s transactions through UPI and e-wallets over the years amounted to Rs. 1.63 crore—well above the threshold for mandatory GST registration.

The notice issued to Hadimani read: “You have done transactions worth Rs. 1.63 crore in the last four years, for which you have to pay GST of Rs. 29 lakh.” Following the notice, the vendor reportedly stopped accepting payments via UPI and other digital platforms.

Defending his position, Hadimani said, “I buy vegetables from local farmers and sell them at my small roadside shop. Customers prefer UPI nowadays, so I accepted those payments. I also file income tax returns regularly and maintain records. I don’t understand how I can be asked to pay such a huge amount.”

This incident highlights the increasing scrutiny on digital transactions by small businesses, even those operating at the grassroots level, and raises concerns over tax compliance awareness in informal sectors.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...

Can Foreign Assets Be Assessed for AY 2018–19 When the First Black Money Act Notice Was Issued in FY 2018–19? Karnataka High Court Says...

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an assessment concerning two properties in Morocco after...

More like this

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...