Validity Of Combined Demand-Cum-SCN Issued For Multiple FY U/s 74 Of CGST Act Requires Judicial Scrutiny: Allahabad High Court

HomeGSTValidity Of Combined Demand-Cum-SCN Issued For Multiple FY U/s 74 Of CGST...

Validity Of Combined Demand-Cum-SCN Issued For Multiple FY U/s 74 Of CGST Act Requires Judicial Scrutiny: Allahabad High Court

GST Top Stories

Published on

12/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Validity Of Combined Demand-Cum-SCN Issued For Multiple FY U/s 74 Of CGST Act Requires Judicial Scrutiny: Allahabad High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court granted interim protection to the petitioner observing that the central issue—validity of combined demand-cum-show-cause notices issued for multiple financial years under Section 74 of the CGST Act—requires judicial scrutiny. The Bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Vivek Saran passed the order while hearing a batch of petitions challenging similar…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Validity Of Combined Demand-Cum-SCN Issued For Multiple FY U/s 74 Of CGST Act Requires Judicial Scrutiny: Allahabad High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

Fixed Facility Charges for Storage Tanks Not Taxable as ‘Supply of Tangible Goods’: CESTAT

No Civil Appeal Lies Against Family Court Orders Granting Maintenance U/s 125 CrPC: Rajasthan High Court

Co-Owners Renting Property Individually Not an “Association of Persons”, Eligible for Separate Service Tax Exemption: CESTAT

E-Way Bill Generation Rises 18.8% YoY to 132.6 Million in February, Signalling Strong Goods Movement

More like this

Fixed Facility Charges for Storage Tanks Not Taxable as ‘Supply of Tangible Goods’: CESTAT

No Civil Appeal Lies Against Family Court Orders Granting Maintenance U/s 125 CrPC: Rajasthan High Court

Co-Owners Renting Property Individually Not an “Association of Persons”, Eligible for Separate Service Tax Exemption: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories