Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTTransfer Of Title Of Goods By Panasonic To Its Customers In DTA...

Transfer Of Title Of Goods By Panasonic To Its Customers In DTA Is Not A Supply: Tamil Nadu AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Author: Khushi J Prajapati

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that the transfer of title of goods by Panasonic to its customers in DTA is not a supply under the GST regime.

The AAR has ruled that transactions involving goods stored in an FTWZ, including those made within an FTWZ or transferred to a DTA, are not covered under para 8(a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act.

It was clarified by the ruling that these transactions remain outside Indian taxable territory until the goods are released for home consumption. Therefore, IGST shall apply only at the time of final clearance from FTWZ to domestic consumption and not during transfers within or outside FTWZ.

Furthermore, no reversal of ITC is needed under section 17(3) of the CGST Act for these types of transactions because they do not constitute supply under amended schedule III. This ruling strengthens that GST applies only when goods are meant for domestic consumption thereby no need to reverse ITC on transfers involving goods stored in FTWZ.

Facts

Panasonic Life Solutions India Private Limited sought clarification from the Tamil Nadu AAR on the GST repercussions of exchanges of goods that are kept in a Free Trade Warehousing Zone (FTWZ).

The applicant mainly asked three questions such as: if the movement of items from the FTWZ to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) or a series of passages within the FTWZ be liable for GST under para 8(a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act; whether Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) would be charged when goods leave from FTWZ to DTA; and does it need any reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) if there are goods excluded from para 8(a) schedule III.

Case Details

Case Name – Panasonic Life Solutions India Pvt Ltd

Court – Authority For Advance Ruling (AAR) Tamil Nadu

Case Number – 17/ARA/2024

Date of Judgement – 25/07/2024

Download Judgment / Order

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Are GST Orders Passed After the Hearing Date Invalid? GSTAT Split Sends Issue to Larger Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Prayagraj Bench, has delivered a split...

Quashing Income Tax Search Doesn’t Automatically Invalidate Case Transfer Or Subsequent Notices: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that setting aside an income tax...

Excess Excise Duty Must Be Adjusted Against Short-Payment When Final Assessment Is Based on Annual Costing: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a central excise duty demand of ₹1.16...

Berry Ratio Inapplicable To Jewellery Manufacturer: ITAT Deletes Rs. 105.06 Crore Transfer Pricing Adjustments 

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted transfer pricing...

More like this

Are GST Orders Passed After the Hearing Date Invalid? GSTAT Split Sends Issue to Larger Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Prayagraj Bench, has delivered a split...

Quashing Income Tax Search Doesn’t Automatically Invalidate Case Transfer Or Subsequent Notices: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that setting aside an income tax...

Excess Excise Duty Must Be Adjusted Against Short-Payment When Final Assessment Is Based on Annual Costing: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a central excise duty demand of ₹1.16...