Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTTata Steel Faces ₹890 Crore GST Show Cause Notice Over Alleged Irregular...

Tata Steel Faces ₹890 Crore GST Show Cause Notice Over Alleged Irregular ITC Claims

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Tata Steel has received a show cause notice from the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and Central Excise authorities in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, over alleged irregular claims of Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to ₹890.52 crore for the financial years 2018–19 to 2020–21.

In a regulatory filing, the steel major disclosed that the notice, dated June 13, was received. The tax department has questioned why the claimed ITC should not be recovered from the company, and has also sought to impose applicable interest and penalties for the said period.

The notice directs Tata Steel to appear before the Additional or Joint Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jamshedpur, within 30 days from the date of receipt to present its case and respond to the allegations.

Responding to the development, Tata Steel stated that it believes the show cause notice is without merit. The company confirmed it will file its formal submissions within the stipulated period and intends to contest the demand. It further assured that the notice has no bearing on its ongoing financial or operational performance.

This notice adds to a growing list of high-profile tax matters under scrutiny, even as large corporations continue to navigate complex indirect tax frameworks post-GST implementation.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...