HomeGSTSupreme Court Stays GST Show Cause Notices Against Online Gaming Companies :...

Supreme Court Stays GST Show Cause Notices Against Online Gaming Companies : Know The Details

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has stayed the GST show cause notices against online gaming companies.

The bench of Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan while passing the interim order of stay on show cause notices in the e-gaming retrospective taxation case until the matter is finally settled. 

The petitioner, Gameskraft was accused of promoting online betting through games like Rummy Culture, Gamezy and Rummy Time. The authorities claimed the company facilitated betting by allowing players to stake money on card games online and failed to issue invoices to customers. 

The GST department imposed a 28% tax on a betting volume of approximately Rs.77,000 crore.

The Online Gaming Firm has challenged the tax department stance to impose a 28% GST  retrospective on the full face value prior to the period from 2 October, 2023.

These companies have been contending that the retrospective imposition of a 28% of GST tax rate is equivalent to sounding a death nail to the industry. 

The GST Council’s 50th meeting was held in Delhi on July 11, 2023, under the chairmanship of the Union Finance & Corporate Affairs Minister, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council has announced changes in taxation for the online gaming industry. The GST Council has decided that online gaming, casinos, and horse racing will be taxed at 28% at the entry point on the total face value of bets. 

The stay not only provides immediate respite to gaming companies from potential coercive action but also safeguards the interests of revenue authorities. 

By pausing proceedings, the court ensures that the demands do not become time-barred during the course of litigation, preserving scope for legal clarity without procedural hindrance.

Read More: CBIC Extends GSTR-5 Due Date To 15th January 2025 

Case Details

Case Title: Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (HQS) and Ors v. Gameskraft Technologies Pvt Ltd.

Case No.: SLP(C) No. 19366-19369/2023

Date: 10/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Senior Advocates Harish Salve, Dr AM Singhvi, Sajan Poovayya, and Gopal Sankaranarayanan along with Advocate Charanya Lakshmikumaran, partner at Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...