Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTSupreme Court Backs Bombay HC’s Interpretation of ‘Where It Is Possible’ Clause...

Supreme Court Backs Bombay HC’s Interpretation of ‘Where It Is Possible’ Clause in Service Tax Recovery Law

GSTSupreme Court

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Supreme Court Backs Bombay HC’s Interpretation of ‘Where It Is Possible’ Clause in Service Tax Recovery Law

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by ANI Technologies Private Limited, the parent company of ride-hailing platform Ola, challenging a Bombay High Court ruling on the interpretation of service tax recovery provisions under the Finance Act, 1994. The bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi declined to interfere…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST Interest Stops Once Tax Reaches Government Account, Can’t Run Until Return Filing: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi, has held that interest under...
GST

Payment Of GST Alone Doesn’t End Interest And Penalty Liability When Tax And Interest Remain Unpaid Beyond 30 Days Of Notice: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Kolkata Bench, has held that belated...
GST

GST Demand Over Builders’ 80% Procurement Rule Requires Reasoned Adjudication: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside an...
GST

Eligible ITC Doesn’t Automatically Entitle Taxpayers To Compensation Cess Refund On Domestic Sales: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Lucknow, has held...

More like this

GST

GST Interest Stops Once Tax Reaches Government Account, Can’t Run Until Return Filing: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi, has held that interest under...
GST

Payment Of GST Alone Doesn’t End Interest And Penalty Liability When Tax And Interest Remain Unpaid Beyond 30 Days Of Notice: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Kolkata Bench, has held that belated...
GST

GST Demand Over Builders’ 80% Procurement Rule Requires Reasoned Adjudication: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside an...