Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGST“Sub-Judice” Remark In GST Order Without Basis Shows Non-Application of Mind: Punjab...

“Sub-Judice” Remark In GST Order Without Basis Shows Non-Application of Mind: Punjab & Haryana HC 

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Punjab & Haryana High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed a GST demand order that held that the adjudicating authority failed to provide cogent reasons and mechanically termed the matter as “sub-judice” without any supporting basis, reflecting complete non-application of mind. The bench of Justice Deepak Sibal and Justice Lapita Banerji set aside the order passed by…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Refund or Adjustment Can’t Be Decided Before Classifying Contract as Works or Service Contract: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the question of refund or adjustment of...
Indirect Taxes

Supreme Court Stays 3 Times Penalty Over Failure to Disclose Order Clarifying Higher Entry Tax Rate

The Supreme Court has stayed further proceedings concerning a penalty of ₹1.17 crore imposed...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Adjudication Limitation Starts Afresh After Court Stay Ends: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs. 20.18 Crore Duty Demand

The Delhi High Court has upheld a customs adjudication order confirming a differential duty...
GST

New GST Pre-Deposit Rule Can’t Apply to Appeals Arising From SCN Issued Before October 1, 2025: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court granted protection concerning the pre-deposit requirement. It held that appeals...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Refund or Adjustment Can’t Be Decided Before Classifying Contract as Works or Service Contract: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the question of refund or adjustment of...
Indirect Taxes

Supreme Court Stays 3 Times Penalty Over Failure to Disclose Order Clarifying Higher Entry Tax Rate

The Supreme Court has stayed further proceedings concerning a penalty of ₹1.17 crore imposed...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Adjudication Limitation Starts Afresh After Court Stay Ends: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs. 20.18 Crore Duty Demand

The Delhi High Court has upheld a customs adjudication order confirming a differential duty...