Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTStatutory 15-Day Reply Period Violated: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection...

Statutory 15-Day Reply Period Violated: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection Order

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
calcutta hc

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has set aside a refund rejection order holding that the GST Department has failed to comply with the mandatory provisions governing response time and opportunity of hearing. The bench of Justice Kausik has observed that Rule 92(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 clearly provides that a taxpayer…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...
GST

GST Appeal Filed Within 3 Months After Excluding Order Date Can’t Be Rejected as Delayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected solely on...
Direct Tax

Jurisdictional Officer Can’t Issue Reassessment Notice Where NFAC Has Exclusive Authority: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has disposed of a taxpayer’s challenge to reassessment...
GST

GST Summons Alone Can’t Justify Anticipatory Bail Without S. 69 Arrest Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that the mere issuance of summons...

More like this

GST

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...
GST

GST Appeal Filed Within 3 Months After Excluding Order Date Can’t Be Rejected as Delayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected solely on...
Direct Tax

Jurisdictional Officer Can’t Issue Reassessment Notice Where NFAC Has Exclusive Authority: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has disposed of a taxpayer’s challenge to reassessment...