Statutory 15-Day Reply Period Violated: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection Order

HomeGSTStatutory 15-Day Reply Period Violated: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection...

Statutory 15-Day Reply Period Violated: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection Order

GST

Published on

03/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has set aside a refund rejection order holding that the GST Department has failed to comply with the mandatory provisions governing response time and opportunity of hearing. The bench of Justice Kausik has observed that Rule 92(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 clearly provides that a taxpayer…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Refund Rejection

Statutory 15-Day Reply Period Violated: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection Order

Membership Required

Latest articles

Offshore Equipment Supplies Not Taxable in India Without Fixed-Place PE: ITAT

PF & ESPP Deductions Can’t Be Treated Like Mandatory Taxes While Assessing Maintenance: Supreme Court

Material Evidence Gaps Bar Restoration of Murder Conviction, Rejects High Court’s “Surmises and Conjectures” Reasoning: Supreme Court

Customs Cargo Service Provider Suspension Can’t Continue Indefinitely Under Regulation 11(2) of HCCAR: CESTAT

More like this

Offshore Equipment Supplies Not Taxable in India Without Fixed-Place PE: ITAT

PF & ESPP Deductions Can’t Be Treated Like Mandatory Taxes While Assessing Maintenance: Supreme Court

Material Evidence Gaps Bar Restoration of Murder Conviction, Rejects High Court’s “Surmises and Conjectures” Reasoning: Supreme Court

About us

Company

Categories