HomeGSTSGST Dept. Lack Jurisdiction Over IGST on Imports: AP HC Quashes Proceedings

SGST Dept. Lack Jurisdiction Over IGST on Imports: AP HC Quashes Proceedings

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that the State GST department cannot initiate proceedings relating to Integrated GST (IGST) on imported goods, reaffirming that the powers lie exclusively with Customs authorities.  The bench of Justice R Raghunandan Rao and Justice T.C.D.Sekhar has observed that Section 6 of the CGST Act and Section 4 of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 4.5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Input Service Benefits Can’t Be Denied: CESTAT Allows Export Refund Despite MMTC Acting as Canalising Agency

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 2.97 Crore E-Cigarette Smuggling Case

A Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) Court at Uran, Maharashtra, has granted bail to...

Mere ‘Wrong Statements’ in Court Pleadings Can’t Trigger Perjury Prosecution: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot direct criminal prosecution merely because a...

Murder Cases by Juveniles Above 16 Are ‘Heinous Offences’: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that an offence of murder punishable under Section 302...

More like this

Input Service Benefits Can’t Be Denied: CESTAT Allows Export Refund Despite MMTC Acting as Canalising Agency

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 2.97 Crore E-Cigarette Smuggling Case

A Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) Court at Uran, Maharashtra, has granted bail to...

Mere ‘Wrong Statements’ in Court Pleadings Can’t Trigger Perjury Prosecution: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot direct criminal prosecution merely because a...