HomeGSTNo Reverse Charge on Purchases of Construction Materials from Unregistered Dealers: AAR

No Reverse Charge on Purchases of Construction Materials from Unregistered Dealers: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that the purchase of construction materials such as M-sand, P-sand, Blue Metals, Boulders and Hollow Bricks from unregistered suppliers is not liable to tax under reverse charge provisions of Section 9(3) or 9(4) of the Central GST Act, 2017.

The bench of  C. Thiyagarajan (Member – CGST) and B. Suseel Kumar (Member – SGST), concluded that M-sand, P-sand, Blue Metals, Boulders and Hollow Bricks  are neither covered under the list of goods notified for reverse charge under Section 9(3), nor does the activity of the applicant fall within the amended provisions of Section 9(4).

The applicant, M/s Amman Blue Metals is engaged in the wholesale and retail trading of the M-Sand, P-Sand, Boulders, Blue Metals, Bricks, Hollow Bricks and other related products. They purchase these goods from unregistered persons within the state. They had raised query in their application as to whether Section 9(3) specifically excludes the said goods. After the amendment of Section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 vide CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018, it is not clear whether they are covered under the class of persons mentioned in the amended Section. 

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue whether buying these raw materials from unregistered persons within the State would attract liability under reverse charge.

The AAR held that purchases of M-Sand, P-Sand, Blue Metals, Boulders and Hollow Bricks from unregistered suppliers are not liable to GST under reverse charge. The goods notified under Section 9(3) exclude these items. Under the amended Section 9(4), liability under reverse charge arises only if the recipient is a promoter engaged in specified activities. Since the applicant is a trader and not a promoter, the provision does not apply.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: M/s. Kasinathan Rupa

Ruling Date: 18/08/2025

Read More: Joint Account Holders Face Tax Notice Glitches Under Rule 114E: Experts Call for Urgent Fix

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that mere facilitation of customs clearance cannot establish...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the income tax department cannot ignore documents,...

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the...

Settled Customs Dispute Can’t Be Reopened Through Article 226 Challenge to Interest Liability: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that a party which consciously opts to settle...

More like this

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that mere facilitation of customs clearance cannot establish...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the income tax department cannot ignore documents,...

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the...