HomeGSTNo Reverse Charge on Purchases of Construction Materials from Unregistered Dealers: AAR

No Reverse Charge on Purchases of Construction Materials from Unregistered Dealers: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that the purchase of construction materials such as M-sand, P-sand, Blue Metals, Boulders and Hollow Bricks from unregistered suppliers is not liable to tax under reverse charge provisions of Section 9(3) or 9(4) of the Central GST Act, 2017.

The bench of  C. Thiyagarajan (Member – CGST) and B. Suseel Kumar (Member – SGST), concluded that M-sand, P-sand, Blue Metals, Boulders and Hollow Bricks  are neither covered under the list of goods notified for reverse charge under Section 9(3), nor does the activity of the applicant fall within the amended provisions of Section 9(4).

The applicant, M/s Amman Blue Metals is engaged in the wholesale and retail trading of the M-Sand, P-Sand, Boulders, Blue Metals, Bricks, Hollow Bricks and other related products. They purchase these goods from unregistered persons within the state. They had raised query in their application as to whether Section 9(3) specifically excludes the said goods. After the amendment of Section 9(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 vide CGST (Amendment) Act, 2018, it is not clear whether they are covered under the class of persons mentioned in the amended Section. 

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue whether buying these raw materials from unregistered persons within the State would attract liability under reverse charge.

The AAR held that purchases of M-Sand, P-Sand, Blue Metals, Boulders and Hollow Bricks from unregistered suppliers are not liable to GST under reverse charge. The goods notified under Section 9(3) exclude these items. Under the amended Section 9(4), liability under reverse charge arises only if the recipient is a promoter engaged in specified activities. Since the applicant is a trader and not a promoter, the provision does not apply.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: M/s. Kasinathan Rupa

Ruling Date: 18/08/2025

Read More: Joint Account Holders Face Tax Notice Glitches Under Rule 114E: Experts Call for Urgent Fix

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...