Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTValidity of R. 39(1)(a) and Retrospective Application of IGST Amendment Questioned: Andhra...

Validity of R. 39(1)(a) and Retrospective Application of IGST Amendment Questioned: Andhra Pradesh High Court Stays GST Recovery Proceedings 

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Andhra Pradesh High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has granted interim relief by staying further recovery proceedings arising from a GST order and accepted the company’s challenge that the impugned proceedings relied upon a statutory rule already struck down by judicial precedent and also sought to apply a later amendment retrospectively to an earlier assessment period.  The Bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Are GST Orders Passed After the Hearing Date Invalid? GSTAT Split Sends Issue to Larger Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Prayagraj Bench, has delivered a split...
Direct Tax

Quashing Income Tax Search Doesn’t Automatically Invalidate Case Transfer Or Subsequent Notices: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that setting aside an income tax...
Indirect Taxes

Excess Excise Duty Must Be Adjusted Against Short-Payment When Final Assessment Is Based on Annual Costing: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a central excise duty demand of ₹1.16...
Direct Tax

Berry Ratio Inapplicable To Jewellery Manufacturer: ITAT Deletes Rs. 105.06 Crore Transfer Pricing Adjustments 

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted transfer pricing...

More like this

GST

Are GST Orders Passed After the Hearing Date Invalid? GSTAT Split Sends Issue to Larger Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Prayagraj Bench, has delivered a split...
Direct Tax

Quashing Income Tax Search Doesn’t Automatically Invalidate Case Transfer Or Subsequent Notices: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that setting aside an income tax...
Indirect Taxes

Excess Excise Duty Must Be Adjusted Against Short-Payment When Final Assessment Is Based on Annual Costing: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a central excise duty demand of ₹1.16...