HomeGSTValidity of R. 39(1)(a) and Retrospective Application of IGST Amendment Questioned: Andhra...

Validity of R. 39(1)(a) and Retrospective Application of IGST Amendment Questioned: Andhra Pradesh High Court Stays GST Recovery Proceedings 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has granted interim relief by staying further recovery proceedings arising from a GST order and accepted the company’s challenge that the impugned proceedings relied upon a statutory rule already struck down by judicial precedent and also sought to apply a later amendment retrospectively to an earlier assessment period.  The Bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

State Can’t Retain Premium for Unutilised Additional FSI Merely Because Refund Provision Is Absent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the Government of Maharashtra cannot refuse to refund...

Mere Abusive or Vulgar Words Don’t Constitute Obscenity Under IPC: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that the use of abusive, vulgar or profane language,...

Supreme Court Quashes Kerala HC’s Cryptic Reversal in Will Dispute

The Supreme Court has set aside a Kerala High Court decision that had reversed...

Supreme Court Rejects Mechanical Reliance on Accident Photographs, Awards Compensation to Families in Fatal Road Crash

The Supreme Court has held that photographs taken several hours after an accident cannot,...

More like this

State Can’t Retain Premium for Unutilised Additional FSI Merely Because Refund Provision Is Absent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the Government of Maharashtra cannot refuse to refund...

Mere Abusive or Vulgar Words Don’t Constitute Obscenity Under IPC: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that the use of abusive, vulgar or profane language,...

Supreme Court Quashes Kerala HC’s Cryptic Reversal in Will Dispute

The Supreme Court has set aside a Kerala High Court decision that had reversed...