HomeGSTRELIANCE JIO | Same-Month ISD Credit Distribution U/R 39(1)(a) Must Be Read...

RELIANCE JIO | Same-Month ISD Credit Distribution U/R 39(1)(a) Must Be Read With ITC Eligibility Conditions: Madras High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has clarified the interpretation of Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules, holding that the requirement to distribute Input Tax Credit (ITC) in the same month applies only after the credit becomes “available for distribution” upon fulfilment of statutory eligibility conditions under Section 16 of the CGST Act.  The bench of Chief…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 4.5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 24, 2026.GSTBOMBAY HIGH COURT ADMITS CHALLENGE...

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside...

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside an...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 24, 2026.GSTBOMBAY HIGH COURT ADMITS CHALLENGE...

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside...

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...