Pre-Trial Incarceration Can’t Be Substitute For Post-Conviction Punishment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 48.6 Lakh Cement-Supply Fraud Case

HomeGSTPre-Trial Incarceration Can’t Be Substitute For Post-Conviction Punishment: Punjab & Haryana High...

Pre-Trial Incarceration Can’t Be Substitute For Post-Conviction Punishment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 48.6 Lakh Cement-Supply Fraud Case

GST

Published on

25/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Pre-Trial Incarceration Can’t Be Substitute For Post-Conviction Punishment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 48.6 Lakh Cement-Supply Fraud Case

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to an accused involved in an alleged cement-supply fraud of Rs. 48.60 lakh, observing that pre-trial incarceration cannot be substituted for post-conviction punishment. The bench Justice Manisha Batra has observed that the petitioner is alleged to have committed offences of cheating and forgery. The case…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Pre-Trial Incarceration Can’t Be Substitute For Post-Conviction Punishment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 48.6 Lakh Cement-Supply Fraud Case

Membership Required

Latest articles

CA, CS, CMA Vs Advocates: Delhi HC Asks BCI To Clarify Its Plea Restricting Non-Advocates From Appearing Before Authorities

Assessee Can’t Use S. 264 Revision to Claim Relief Omitted From Original Return: Supreme Court

Proposed Audit Exemption for Companies Up to Rs. 200 Crore Turnover Sparks Accountability Concerns

GST Adjudication Order Ignoring CBIC Circular Challenged: Bombay HC Grants Ad-Interim Protection to Skoda Auto Volkswagen

More like this

CA, CS, CMA Vs Advocates: Delhi HC Asks BCI To Clarify Its Plea Restricting Non-Advocates From Appearing Before Authorities

Assessee Can’t Use S. 264 Revision to Claim Relief Omitted From Original Return: Supreme Court

Proposed Audit Exemption for Companies Up to Rs. 200 Crore Turnover Sparks Accountability Concerns

About us

Company

Categories