Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMadras High Court Orders Rs. 241 Crore Pre-Deposit in Rs. 4,500+ Crore...

Madras High Court Orders Rs. 241 Crore Pre-Deposit in Rs. 4,500+ Crore GST Dispute Over Classification of Catalysts

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has directed the deposit approximately Rs. 241 crore as a condition for entertaining its writ petitions challenging massive tax demands exceeding Rs. 4,500 crore. The bench of Justice C. Saravanan has observed that the assessee is otherwise required to pre-deposit the amounts as per Section 107 (6B), while entertaining the Writ…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 22, 2026.GSTGSTN INTRODUCES EMSIGNER VERSION 3.3...

Bribe Demand and Acceptance Must Be Proved; Money Recovery Alone Can’t Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction of a Patwari under Sections 7...

Statutory SCN Mandatory For GST Demand: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside a...

GST | S. 74 Can’t Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression or Intent to Evade Tax: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a Goods and Services Tax (GST) show...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 22, 2026.GSTGSTN INTRODUCES EMSIGNER VERSION 3.3...

Bribe Demand and Acceptance Must Be Proved; Money Recovery Alone Can’t Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction of a Patwari under Sections 7...

Statutory SCN Mandatory For GST Demand: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside a...