Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTPersonal Hearing Before Reply Deadline: Uttarakhand HC Quashes GST Assessment Order

Personal Hearing Before Reply Deadline: Uttarakhand HC Quashes GST Assessment Order

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Uttarakhand High Court has quashed a GST assessment order passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act after finding that the adjudicating authority fixed the date of personal hearing before the expiry of the time granted to the taxpayer for filing its reply to the show cause notice.

The Bench of Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Subhash Upadhyay has observed that the date of personal hearing was fixed before the last date of submission of the reply to the show cause notice, and, therefore, the procedure adopted was wholly illegal.

The petitioner challenged the show cause notice issued in Form GST DRC-01 dated May 22, 2024, as well as the consequential order passed in Form GST DRC-07 dated August 21, 2024. The taxpayer contended that although an opportunity of personal hearing had been granted, the hearing was scheduled before the last date available for filing a reply to the show cause notice, thereby depriving it of a meaningful opportunity to present its defence.

During the proceedings, the petitioner relied upon an earlier decision of the High Court in M/s Abuturrab Agencies v. The Commissioner, State Tax and Another, wherein a similar procedural defect had been considered. The taxpayer argued that fixing the hearing date before the expiry of the reply period defeated the very purpose of adjudication and violated the statutory scheme governing GST proceedings.

The department conceded that the personal hearing had indeed been scheduled 18 days prior to the last date fixed for filing the reply. It was acknowledged that the opportunity of hearing offered in such circumstances could not be regarded as a genuine or effective hearing and was not in conformity with the prescribed procedure.

The High Court observed that the hearing provided to the taxpayer was merely illusory and failed to satisfy the requirements of natural justice. Consequently, the Court quashed the assessment order and remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration.

The Court directed the adjudicating officer to proceed afresh from the stage of the show cause notice and to fix a fresh date of personal hearing after providing the taxpayer a proper opportunity to submit its reply and supporting documents.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: No Extension Beyond 30 June 2026 for Filing Backlog GST Appeals: GSTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CAG Flags Rs. 20 Crore Excess ITC, Delayed GST Recovery and Bid-Rigging Risks in Himachal Pradesh

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has flagged serious deficiencies in Himachal...

NCLT Rejects Insolvency Plea Over ₹3.11 Crore GST Success Fee

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, has dismissed an insolvency petition seeking recovery...

Transport Expenses Can’t Be Disallowed After AO Verifies Transactions as Genuine: Income Tax Appeal Allowed [READ ODER]

The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) has deleted an addition of ₹42.09 lakh made...

Mere Surge in Penny Stock Price Cannot Make Capital Gains Bogus Without Evidence Linking Assessee to Manipulation: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that a steep and commercially inexplicable increase in...

More like this

CAG Flags Rs. 20 Crore Excess ITC, Delayed GST Recovery and Bid-Rigging Risks in Himachal Pradesh

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has flagged serious deficiencies in Himachal...

NCLT Rejects Insolvency Plea Over ₹3.11 Crore GST Success Fee

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, has dismissed an insolvency petition seeking recovery...

Transport Expenses Can’t Be Disallowed After AO Verifies Transactions as Genuine: Income Tax Appeal Allowed [READ ODER]

The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) has deleted an addition of ₹42.09 lakh made...