HomeGSTPre-deposit payment via Electronic Credit Ledger is a "Valid" and "Sufficient Compliance":...

Pre-deposit payment via Electronic Credit Ledger is a “Valid” and “Sufficient Compliance”: Supreme Court Rejects Dept. SLP

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has held that pre-deposit payment via electronic credit ledger is a “valid” and “sufficient compliance.

The bench of Justice B.V. Nagarathnaand and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma has rejected the Special Leave Petition filed by the Goods and Service (GST) department and upheld the Gujarat High Court ruling by which it was held that the amount paid by the petitioner as pre- deposit in compliance of section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act utilizing the amount of Electronic Credit Ledger is required to be considered valid and letter issued by the respondent/department directing the petitioner to pay pre-deposit amount through Electronic Cash Ledger is therefore, hereby quashed and set aside.

Background

The petitioner is public limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing and exporting specialized chemicals such as aroma chemicals, food antioxidants, rubber chemicals and lubricant additives. A substantial portion of the petitioner’s products is also exported resulting in significant contribution to the foreign exchange earnings of the country.

The petitioner had preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and also deposited the pre-deposit amount to the tune of Rs. 3,36,82,000/- in compliance of section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act utilizing the amount available in the Electronic Credit Ledger vide Form GST DRC-03 dated 26.12.2022. However, the respondent vide impugned letter directed the petitioner to pay the pre-deposit through Electronic Cash Ledger and also directed to produce the relevant proof regarding the same before or at the time of attending the personal hearing in the matter.

Read More:

Case Details

Case Title: UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Versus M/S YASHO INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Case No.: SLP(C) No. 014841 / 2025

Date: 19-05-2025

Counsel For Petitioner: GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

Counsel For Respondent: TAS LAW[caveat], Abhishek A. Rastogi

Read More: Imagining India with Gender-Neutral Laws In 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...