HomeGSTRs. 8.02 Crores Dispute Between Vedanata And GST Dept.; Dept. Alleges It...

Rs. 8.02 Crores Dispute Between Vedanata And GST Dept.; Dept. Alleges It To Be A Wrongful ITC While Vedanta Name It As Discrepancy: Orissa High Court Directs Vedanta To Reply To SCN

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has directed Vedanta to reply to the show cause notice in respect of a sum of ₹8,02,84,232 by which the department claims it to be a wrongly availed input tax credit (ITC).

The bench of Acting Chief Justice Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo has observed that Vedanta petitioner will reply to impugned show-cause notice. In it, Vedanta will be at liberty to take all points, including the point of limitation. The authority says and will pass the order by 5th February, 2025. 

In respect of the tax period July, 2017 to March, 2018 there was a discrepancy between his client’s account and the goods and services tax (GST) annual return. It was a discrepancy, of which his client became aware and pointed out to the taxing authorities. The discrepancy was also noticed in the audit directed by the Comptroller and Auditor General.

The jurisdictional officer sought for explanation, pursuant to the audit report. His client furnished an explanation to the satisfaction of the officer. It was duly reported. However, the audit case was not closed but kept pending. 

The assessee contended that the department invoked the extended period of limitation on bare allegations, to issue show-cause notice dated 5th August, 2024 on the last date of the extended prescribed time. 

The court noted that as per the show-cause notice, there is an issue between petitioner-assessee and revenue. Petitioner says it is a discrepancy while revenue says petitioner wrongly availed input tax credit (ITC). Impugned show- cause notice bears record of explanation sought for by the jurisdictional officer, furnished and satisfaction recorded. All the above in respect of a sum of ₹8,02,84,232.

The court disposed of the petition.

Read More: Caramel Popcorn And Now Kerala’s Favourite Snack ‘Pazhampori’ Falls Prey To 18% GST: GST Rate Rationalisation Becomes India’s Dream

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Vedanta Ltd., Jharsuguda Versus UOI

Case No.: W.P.(C) No.24191 of 2024

Date: 21.01.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: V. Sridharan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Prashanta Kumar Nayak

Counsel For Respondent: Satyanarayan Pattanayak, Advocate

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 28 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 28, 2026.GSTPUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT...

Liquidation After Successful Resolution Applicant Backtracks From CoC-Approved RP: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) cannot withdraw from...

S. 138 NI Act Proceedings Continue Despite Personal Insolvency Moratorium Under IBC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

No TIP, Doubtful Identification: Supreme Court Acquits Convicts In Rape-Murder Case

The Supreme Court has acquitted two men who had been sentenced to death in...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 28 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 28, 2026.GSTPUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT...

Liquidation After Successful Resolution Applicant Backtracks From CoC-Approved RP: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) cannot withdraw from...

S. 138 NI Act Proceedings Continue Despite Personal Insolvency Moratorium Under IBC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...