HomeGSTOmission of R. 96(10) Without Saving Clause Nullifies Pending GST Refund Recovery...

Omission of R. 96(10) Without Saving Clause Nullifies Pending GST Refund Recovery Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that all pending proceedings initiated under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017 lapse automatically following the rule’s omission, in the absence of a saving clause. The Court set aside recovery orders running into crores and directed refund of any amounts already recovered. The Bench of Justice R….

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Upholds Customs Classification of Mitsubishi’s Electric Power Steering ECU as Automobile Part

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Job Work Can’t Be Treated as ‘Exempted Service’; No 7% CENVAT Reversal on Job Charges: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Captive Power Transfer Must Be Valued at Consumer Tariff, Not Electricity Board Purchase Rate: Chhattisgarh High Court

The Chhattisgarh High Court has dismissed the Income Tax Department's appeal holding that the...

Calcutta High Court Orders Restoration of GST Registration Despite Six-Month Return Default, Cites Livelihood Concerns

The Calcutta High Court has directed the restoration of a farmer producer company's GST...

More like this

CESTAT Upholds Customs Classification of Mitsubishi’s Electric Power Steering ECU as Automobile Part

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Job Work Can’t Be Treated as ‘Exempted Service’; No 7% CENVAT Reversal on Job Charges: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Captive Power Transfer Must Be Valued at Consumer Tariff, Not Electricity Board Purchase Rate: Chhattisgarh High Court

The Chhattisgarh High Court has dismissed the Income Tax Department's appeal holding that the...