Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTOfficer Conducting Audit Can’t Adjudicate Same Matter Without Deciding Jurisdictional Objection: Karnataka...

Officer Conducting Audit Can’t Adjudicate Same Matter Without Deciding Jurisdictional Objection: Karnataka HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has set aside a GST Order-in-Original passed against a taxpayer after observing that a serious objection had been raised regarding the same officer conducting both audit proceedings and adjudication proceedings.  The bench of Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav observed that the proceedings initiated by the audit authority as well as the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Unreliable Panchnama, Unproduced Private Ledger Can’t Prove Clandestine Removal: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

Only Amortised Value Of Customer-Owned Tools And Dies Can Be Included In Assessable Value Of Auto Parts: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Customs Exemption Unavailable When Aircraft Operated Without Valid Charter Permit: CESTAT Upholds Confiscation, Rs. 2.5 Crore Fine

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Customs Penalty Can’t Exceed Rs. 50K Limit Under Cargo Handling Regulations: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has reduced a...

More like this

Unreliable Panchnama, Unproduced Private Ledger Can’t Prove Clandestine Removal: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

Only Amortised Value Of Customer-Owned Tools And Dies Can Be Included In Assessable Value Of Auto Parts: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Customs Exemption Unavailable When Aircraft Operated Without Valid Charter Permit: CESTAT Upholds Confiscation, Rs. 2.5 Crore Fine

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...