Validity of Notifications Issued Without ‘Force Majeure’ Under Section 168A Questioned: Calcutta HC Stays GST Recovery

HomeGSTValidity of Notifications Issued Without ‘Force Majeure’ Under Section 168A Questioned: Calcutta...

Validity of Notifications Issued Without ‘Force Majeure’ Under Section 168A Questioned: Calcutta HC Stays GST Recovery

GST

Published on

20/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court while questioning the validity of notifications issued without ‘Force Majeure’ Under Section 168A of the GST Act restrained State GST department from taking any coercive recovery steps against the petitioner/assessee pursuant to an adjudication order dated August 11, 2024 passed under Section 73 of the WBGST Act, 2017 and CGST Act,…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Force Majeure

Validity of Notifications Issued Without ‘Force Majeure’ Under Section 168A Questioned: Calcutta HC Stays GST Recovery

Membership Required

Latest articles

Monsoon Session 2026: Centre to Push Key Bills on Income Tax, MSMEs, Supreme Court, Foreign Funding and Higher Education

Clause-by-Clause Analysis of the Draft Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Input Service Benefits Can’t Be Denied: CESTAT Allows Export Refund Despite MMTC Acting as Canalising Agency

Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 2.97 Crore E-Cigarette Smuggling Case

More like this

Monsoon Session 2026: Centre to Push Key Bills on Income Tax, MSMEs, Supreme Court, Foreign Funding and Higher Education

Clause-by-Clause Analysis of the Draft Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2026

Input Service Benefits Can’t Be Denied: CESTAT Allows Export Refund Despite MMTC Acting as Canalising Agency

About us

Company

Categories