Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNon-Filing of LUT Before Export Not Fatal to GST Refund Claims: Karnataka...

Non-Filing of LUT Before Export Not Fatal to GST Refund Claims: Karnataka High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has held that non-submission of a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) or bond prior to export cannot be treated as a fatal defect for denying GST refunds, especially when exports are otherwise undisputed. The Court set aside a refund rejection order passed by GST authorities and remanded the matter for fresh consideration…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection Against Recovery After Plea That Underlying Order Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has directed that no coercive action be taken against the...

CBIC Clarifies Rupee Receipts, Set-Offs; Bars Refund Recovery Where AD Bank Writes Off Realisation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that payments for...

GSTR-1 Duplication Can’t Create Tax Liability Without Second Supply: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

GST Demand Can’t Be Confirmed Without SCN; DRC-01 Summary No Substitute: GSTAT Bengaluru

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

More like this

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection Against Recovery After Plea That Underlying Order Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has directed that no coercive action be taken against the...

CBIC Clarifies Rupee Receipts, Set-Offs; Bars Refund Recovery Where AD Bank Writes Off Realisation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that payments for...

GSTR-1 Duplication Can’t Create Tax Liability Without Second Supply: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...