No Response on GST Portal? Officer Must Explore Other Modes Under Section 169, Preferably RPAD: Madras High Court

HomeGSTNo Response on GST Portal? Officer Must Explore Other Modes Under Section...

No Response on GST Portal? Officer Must Explore Other Modes Under Section 169, Preferably RPAD: Madras High Court

GST Top Stories

Published on

23/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

No Response on GST Portal? Officer Must Explore Other Modes Under Section 169, Preferably RPAD: Madras High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that where a taxpayer does not respond to notices issued through one mode—such as uploading on the GST portal—the Proper Officer is duty-bound to explore other valid modes of service prescribed under Section 169(1) of the CGST Act, preferably by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (RPAD)….

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Portal

No Response on GST Portal? Officer Must Explore Other Modes Under Section 169, Preferably RPAD: Madras High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Bail in GST Bribery Case Over Alleged Impersonation of Commissioner, Conspiracy to Demand Bribe

Whether Ledger Non-Handover By Junior Accountant Constitutes Criminal Breach Of Trust: Chhattisgarh High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rs. 41.62 Lakh Hotel Case

Whether GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns Can Be Restored Under Rule 22(4) Proviso Despite Delay in Appeal? Gauhati High Court Answers

Delhi Customs | Rs. 5.51 Crore Gold, Luxury Watch Seizure: Court Grants 14 Day Judicial Custody

More like this

Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Bail in GST Bribery Case Over Alleged Impersonation of Commissioner, Conspiracy to Demand Bribe

Whether Ledger Non-Handover By Junior Accountant Constitutes Criminal Breach Of Trust: Chhattisgarh High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rs. 41.62 Lakh Hotel Case

Whether GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns Can Be Restored Under Rule 22(4) Proviso Despite Delay in Appeal? Gauhati High Court Answers

About us

Company

Categories