Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNo GST On Reimbursement Of Electricity Charges On Actual Basis: AAR

No GST On Reimbursement Of Electricity Charges On Actual Basis: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The West Bengal Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled that goods and service tax (GST) is not payable on reimbursement of electricity charges on actual basis.

The bench of Dr Tanisha Dutta and Joyjit Banik has observed that the applicant will be deemed to be acting as pure agent in regard to supply of electricity to its sub-lessee and the reimbursement amount shall not be a part of his value of supply.

The applicant, Mega Flex Plastics Ltd. has taken a land on lease situated in the ‘Howrah Poly Park’ for a period of 99 years by a Deed of Lease executed with the West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Limited (WBIDC) with a right to transfer or mortgage or assign its leasehold interest.

The applicant has developed the land and has constructed a factory building & warehouse over the said land. The applicant has let out a warehouse space vide a deed of Sub- Lease to White Saffron Grains LLP (sub-lessee) for a period of ten years commencing from April 1, 2022 for putting up a manufacturing unit against a lease rent payable monthly by the Sub-Lessee to the applicant.

The applicant, in addition to the lease rent mentioned above, is also entitled to reimbursement for electricity charges on an actual basis as specified in the agreement.

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue whether GST is liable to be paid on reimbursement of electricity charges on actual basis.

The applicant contended that reimbursement of expenses of electricity charges should not be a part of consideration since the applicant is acting here as a pure agent. As per para (a) of explanation of rule 33, “pure agent” is a person who “enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as his pure agent to incur expenditure or costs in the course of supply of goods or services or both”.

The AAR has held that the applicant is not liable to pay GST on reimbursement of electricity charges on actual basis.

Ruling Details

Applicant Name: Mega Flex Plastics Ltd

Date: 27/02/2025

Read More: GST Payable On Reimbursement Of Municipal Property Tax By Lessee/Occupier: AAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A Mismatch Cannot Trigger 100% Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has ruled that a mismatch between...

Audit Detection Alone Can’t Trigger 100% GST Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has held that discrepancies detected...

Processed Milk Used in Confectionery Production Is Not Exempted Final Product: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Must Be Reversed Once Provision for Partial Write-Off Is Created; Subsequent Use Must Be Proved With Records: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Mere GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A Mismatch Cannot Trigger 100% Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has ruled that a mismatch between...

Audit Detection Alone Can’t Trigger 100% GST Penalty Without Proof of Fraud or Suppression: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has held that discrepancies detected...

Processed Milk Used in Confectionery Production Is Not Exempted Final Product: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...