Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNo GST Notices Issued to Small Traders, Street Vendors on UPI Transactions:...

No GST Notices Issued to Small Traders, Street Vendors on UPI Transactions: Nirmala Sitharaman

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Union Finance Ministry has categorically denied reports that the Central GST authorities have issued notices to small traders and street vendors across the country, including Karnataka, based solely on their UPI transactions.

Responding to a starred question in the Lok Sabha, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stated that “no such notices have been issued without assessment of business activities”. The clarification comes amid growing concerns and media reports suggesting harassment of small businesses through tax demands linked to digital payments.

GST Evasion Data from Karnataka
While dismissing the allegation of unwarranted notices, the government released figures on GST evasion cases detected in Karnataka.

  • 2022-23: 959 cases detected, involving ₹25,839 crore, with ₹1,705 crore recovered voluntarily; 2 arrests made.
  • 2023-24: 925 cases, ₹7,202 crore detected, ₹1,197 crore recovered; 2 arrests.
  • 2024-25: 1,254 cases, ₹39,577 crore detected, ₹1,623 crore recovered; 9 arrests.

The Finance Minister clarified that these evasion cases were not linked to systemic flaws within the GST framework.

Measures to Ease Compliance for Small Businesses

Highlighting efforts to reduce the compliance burden on small and medium enterprises (SMEs), Sitharaman noted several GST Council–recommended relaxations:

Exemption from GST registration for intra-state supply of goods up to ₹40 lakh turnover (₹20 lakh in special category states) and services up to ₹20 lakh turnover (₹10 lakh in special category states).

Composition levy scheme for businesses with turnover up to prescribed limits, with a reduced tax rate of 1% for traders/manufacturers and 5% for restaurants.

Quarterly return filing with monthly tax payment for entities with turnover up to ₹5 crore.

Optional filing of annual returns for FY 2017-18 to FY 2023-24 for businesses with turnover up to Rs. 2 crore.

The statement appears aimed at addressing both political and business community concerns over alleged overreach by tax authorities, especially in light of the rapid growth of digital transactions in India.

Read More: Supreme Court Slams CGST Dept. for Appealing Against Its Own Commissioner’s Order in SpiceJet Case

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

Test Identification Parade is Corroborative Evidence And Not Substantive: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man sentenced to imprisonment for the remainder of...

Corporate Criminal Case Can’t Be Quashed Merely Because No Employee Is Named as Accused: Supreme Court Lays Down 3 Stage Mens Rea Test

The Supreme Court has held that criminal proceedings against a company cannot be quashed...

More like this

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

Test Identification Parade is Corroborative Evidence And Not Substantive: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man sentenced to imprisonment for the remainder of...