Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMumbai GST Dept. Tightens Investigation Norms: CCTV Mandate, Summons Scrutiny, and Ban...

Mumbai GST Dept. Tightens Investigation Norms: CCTV Mandate, Summons Scrutiny, and Ban on After-Hours Detention

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant move reinforcing accountability in tax investigations, the Office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Mumbai, has issued an Office Memorandum dated April 8, 2025, in adherence to directions issued by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. 

The action stems from the High Court’s order dated April 1, 2025, in the case Mahesh Devchand Gala vs. Union of India & Ors. (Criminal Writ Petition No. 938 of 2024), which emphasized the protection of procedural rights during GST investigations.

The memorandum mandates strict compliance with the following key directions:

  1. CCTV Installation and Statement Recording: The circular underscores the binding nature of the Supreme Court’s ruling dated February 21, 2023, in Paramvir Singh Saini vs. Baljit Singh & Ors. (SLP (Criminal) No. 3543/2020). The ruling requires the installation of CCTV cameras in investigation premises and the proper recording of statements to ensure transparency and protect the rights of individuals during investigations.
  2. Monitoring of Search Warrants and Summons: All Commissioners have been instructed to adhere to CBIC Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST (Inv.) dated March 30, 2024. This directive stresses careful scrutiny over the issuance of search warrants and summons, highlighting the need for procedural integrity.
  3. Restrictions on Post-Office Hour Detentions: A crucial directive within the memorandum states that no individual should be detained in office premises beyond working hours, except in accordance with established legal procedures. Commissionerates have been instructed to ensure strict compliance and monitoring in this regard.

The memorandum, issued with the approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner, CGST & CX., Mumbai Zone, has been circulated to all Principal Commissioners and Commissioners in the zone.

Read More: Bank Fraud: Madhya Pradesh Labourer Receives Rs. 314 Crore Income Tax Notice

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Refund After Successful Appeal | 6% Interest Runs From 60 Days After Original Application: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Andhra Pradesh State Bench at Vijayawada,...

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...

GST Audit Detection Alone Doesn’t Prove Wilful Suppression: GSTAT Quashes S. 74 Proceedings

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that a...

More like this

GST Refund After Successful Appeal | 6% Interest Runs From 60 Days After Original Application: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Andhra Pradesh State Bench at Vijayawada,...

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...