Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMeerut Court Approves Judicial Custody of Accused in ₹10.85 Crore GST Fraud...

Meerut Court Approves Judicial Custody of Accused in ₹10.85 Crore GST Fraud Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Special Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court in Meerut has ordered judicial custody of a person accused of a massive Rs. 10.85 crore tax evasion case under the CGST Act, 2017.

The accused was booked under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(1)(i) by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), RZU Ghaziabad.

The person was accused of playing a key role in orchestrating fraudulent GST activities.

During the hearing, Special Public Prosecutor Lakshay Kumar Singh delivered blazing arguments, exposing Guma’s pivotal role in the tax fraud.

Convinced by the prosecution’s strong presentation of facts and the serious financial nature of the offense, the court granted the request for 14-day judicial custody. The accused will remain lodged in Meerut District Jail until July 4, 2025.

The court emphasized the grave nature of the crime, which involves fraudulent claims and evasion amounting to over Rs. 10.85 crore, and observed that custodial interrogation and judicial oversight were necessary.

Authorities have been instructed to ensure the presence of the accused on the next hearing date via video conferencing.

Read More: Government May Allow SEZ Units to Sell in India by Paying Only Input Duty

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

SEIZURE IS NOT CONVICTION

The Article “SEIZURE IS NOT CONVICTION” is authored by SRINIVASAN GOPAL, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR(RETD) NATIONAL...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 2, 2026.GSTCAN GST CONFISCATION PROCEEDINGS BE...

Business Purpose Alone Can’t Secure GST Credit: GSTAT Upholds ITC Disallowance For Lack Of Evidence

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad Bench, has upheld the disallowance...

Annual Return Errors Can’t Defeat ITC Protected By Retrospective S. 16(5): GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has set...

More like this

SEIZURE IS NOT CONVICTION

The Article “SEIZURE IS NOT CONVICTION” is authored by SRINIVASAN GOPAL, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR(RETD) NATIONAL...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 2, 2026.GSTCAN GST CONFISCATION PROCEEDINGS BE...

Business Purpose Alone Can’t Secure GST Credit: GSTAT Upholds ITC Disallowance For Lack Of Evidence

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad Bench, has upheld the disallowance...