HomeGSTMadhya Pradesh High Court Stays GST Demand For Grant Of Mining Lease/Royalty 

Madhya Pradesh High Court Stays GST Demand For Grant Of Mining Lease/Royalty 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jabalpur Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court has stayed the GST demand for grant of mining lease/royalty.

The bench of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf while reserving the right of the respondent-department to move for vacation of ad interim stay, the court directed that in the proposed recovery of GST on royalty shall remain stayed.

Swapnil Sohgaura, the Counsel for the petitioner while informing the Jurishour.in has stated that no doubt the Supreme Court has upheld the levy of GST on royalty paid for mining rights basis, however, the issue related to the retrospective or prospective applicability of GST on mining lease/royalty is still pending before the Supreme Court.

Mr. Sohgaura added that the dispute pertains to the period of 2018-19, and 2020-21 when the issue of GST on grant of mining lease/royalty was not decided by the Supreme Court.

Case Details

Case Title: Treders Through Propwright Harsh Khedia Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh 

Case No.:  WP No. 2381 of 2025

Date: 27-01-2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Swapnil Sohgaura 

Read More: Delhi High Court Directs Release Of Rs. 23.50 Lakhs Seized By DGGI Along With Interest

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

‘Reason to Believe’ vs ‘Information Suggesting Escapement’: Supreme Court to Decide Core Reassessment Standard Under Income Tax Act

In a case that could redefine the contours of reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax...

CAT Directs Retrospective Pay Fixation for Central Excise Officers from 1996

The Chennai Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has directed the government to...

Consolidation Of SCNs Covering Multiple FY Under S. 73, 74 of CGST Act Allowed: Delhi HC 

The Delhi High Court has allowed the consolidation of show cause notices (SCNs) covering...

More like this

‘Reason to Believe’ vs ‘Information Suggesting Escapement’: Supreme Court to Decide Core Reassessment Standard Under Income Tax Act

In a case that could redefine the contours of reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax...

CAT Directs Retrospective Pay Fixation for Central Excise Officers from 1996

The Chennai Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has directed the government to...

Consolidation Of SCNs Covering Multiple FY Under S. 73, 74 of CGST Act Allowed: Delhi HC 

The Delhi High Court has allowed the consolidation of show cause notices (SCNs) covering...