Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTJharkhand High Court Allows Input Tax Credit On Delayed Returns 

Jharkhand High Court Allows Input Tax Credit On Delayed Returns 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has allowed the Input Tax Credit on delayed returns.

The bench of Chief Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Deepak Roshan has observed that Clause (5) of Section 16 inserted by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, with effect from 01.07.2017, the department directed to allow the petitioner to take Input Tax Credit in respect of delayed returns filed for the Financial Year 2017-18, and the interest and penalty levied on the petitioner by the respondents shall be refunded with 6% p.a interest from the date of such collection till the date of repayment.

Section 16(5) relates to relaxation in conditions of section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.07.2017. Extending the deadline for claiming ITC for invoices or debit notes under section 16(4) of the CGST Act, to 30th November, 2021 for financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged Section 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as ultra vires, inasmuch as, it seeks to restrict the availment of Input Tax Credit, within a time frame, which is being violative of Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 300A of the Constitution of India and also being violative of the basic structure of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The court disposed of the writ petition.

Read More: Latest Landmark Judgements On GST – 2024

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Ram Constructions Versus UOI

Case No.: Union of India

Date: W.P (T) No. 2148 of 2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Nitin Kumar Pasari 

Counsel For Respondent: Ashok Kumar Yadav

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...