HomeGSTJharkhand High Court Allows Input Tax Credit On Delayed ReturnsĀ 

Jharkhand High Court Allows Input Tax Credit On Delayed ReturnsĀ 

Published on

šŸš€ Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has allowed the Input Tax Credit on delayed returns.

The bench of Chief Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Deepak Roshan has observed that Clause (5) of Section 16 inserted by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, with effect from 01.07.2017, the department directed to allow the petitioner to take Input Tax Credit in respect of delayed returns filed for the Financial Year 2017-18, and the interest and penalty levied on the petitioner by the respondents shall be refunded with 6% p.a interest from the date of such collection till the date of repayment.

Section 16(5) relates to relaxation in conditions of section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.07.2017. Extending the deadline for claiming ITC for invoices or debit notes under section 16(4) of the CGST Act, to 30th November, 2021 for financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged Section 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as ultra vires, inasmuch as, it seeks to restrict the availment of Input Tax Credit, within a time frame, which is being violative of Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 300A of the Constitution of India and also being violative of the basic structure of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The court disposed of the writ petition.

Read More: Latest Landmark Judgements On GST – 2024

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Ram Constructions Versus UOI

Case No.: Union of India

Date: W.P (T) No. 2148 of 2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Nitin Kumar Pasari 

Counsel For Respondent: Ashok Kumar Yadav

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...

Relaxation in TET Doesn’t Bar Reserved Candidates from Open Category Selection Based on Merit: Supreme CourtĀ 

The Supreme Court has held that candidates belonging to reserved categories who avail relaxation...

More like this

State Can’t Unilaterally Decide Breach and Bar Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award

The Supreme Court has held that a State authority cannot unilaterally determine breach of...

Developments in Parallel Proceedings—Such as Insolvency Resolutions or OTS Approvals—Can’t Be Used to Reopen Concluded SLP: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent developments in parallel proceedings, including insolvency resolutions...

No Right to Appointment from Unfilled Vacancy Due to Non-Joining: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that a candidate cannot claim appointment to a government...