HomeGST56th GST Council: Intermediary Concept Omitted From Section 13(8) of IGST Act 

56th GST Council: Intermediary Concept Omitted From Section 13(8) of IGST Act 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant move aimed at boosting India’s services exports, the 56th GST Council meeting chaired by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has recommended a key amendment in the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act, 2017.

The Council has proposed the omission of clause (b) of Section 13(8) of the IGST Act, which presently determines the place of supply for intermediary services as the location of the service provider. Once the amendment takes effect, the place of supply for such services will instead be determined under the default rule of Section 13(2) of the IGST Act — i.e., the location of the recipient of services.

This change will effectively treat intermediary services provided by Indian entities to overseas clients as “exports of services,” making them eligible for export-related benefits, including zero-rated tax treatment.

Industry experts and exporters have long demanded this reform, as the existing provision created tax disadvantages for Indian intermediaries providing services to foreign clients. The reform is expected to remove ambiguities and bring India in line with global tax practices.

Speaking after the meeting, officials highlighted that this step is a part of the government’s broader vision to simplify GST provisions and strengthen India’s position as a global hub for services.

The proposed amendment will come into force after the necessary legislative changes are carried out in Parliament.

Read More: Next-Gen GST Reform: Car Prices to Drop as Tax Reduced from 28% to 18%

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Officer Violated Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules By Giving 7 Days To Reply To SCN Instead Of 15 Days: Bombay HC Names It...

The Bombay High Court has frowned on the GST Officer for violating Rule 92(3)...

Customs and Indirect Taxes | 669 Assistant Commissioner Grade Officers Transferred & Posted: CHECK LIST

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified the transfer and...

Reverse Charge Mechanism under GST

India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, introduced in 2017, brought a unified and...

Procedural Error Cannot Deny RoSCTL Export Benefits: CESTAT Allows Amendment of Shipping Bills

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set...

More like this

GST Officer Violated Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules By Giving 7 Days To Reply To SCN Instead Of 15 Days: Bombay HC Names It...

The Bombay High Court has frowned on the GST Officer for violating Rule 92(3)...

Customs and Indirect Taxes | 669 Assistant Commissioner Grade Officers Transferred & Posted: CHECK LIST

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has notified the transfer and...

Reverse Charge Mechanism under GST

India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, introduced in 2017, brought a unified and...