HomeGSTBombay High Court Grants Interim Protection Against ₹9.34 Crore GST Recovery in...

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection Against ₹9.34 Crore GST Recovery in Pre-GST Development Rights Dispute

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has granted ad-interim relief to a real estate developer by restraining the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities from taking any coercive recovery action in a dispute involving the levy of GST on transfer of development rights (TDR) allegedly arising from transactions undertaken during the pre-GST regime.

The bench of Justice Suman Shyam and Justice Advait M. Sethna passed the order while hearing a writ petition filed by Vital Developers Private Limited challenging a recovery action initiated by the GST department.

BUY NOW : Litigation Guide For GSTAT : From Litigation Checklist To Procedure Guide Specially Designed To Carter Requirements Of CAs, Advocate

The petitioner approached the High Court questioning the legality of an order dated March 30, 2026, through which GST authorities sought recovery of approximately ₹9.34 crore. According to the Court’s order, the petitioner assailed the recovery proceedings on multiple legal grounds and sought appropriate relief against the demand.

The dispute assumes significance because it concerns the contentious issue of whether GST can be imposed on transfer of development rights that were transferred prior to the introduction of GST on July 1, 2017. The taxability of development rights and related real estate transactions has been the subject of extensive litigation across various judicial forums.

When the matter came up for hearing, none of the respondents, including the Union of India and GST authorities, appeared before the Court despite having been duly served with copies of the writ petition. The petitioner’s counsel filed an affidavit of service, which was taken on record by the Bench.

Observing that the respondents had failed to appear despite valid service, the Court held that it had no option but to issue formal court notice for adjudication of the controversy involved in the petition. Notices were issued to Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, returnable on August 3, 2026.

During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought urgent ad-interim protection against recovery proceedings. Taking note of the facts and circumstances presented before it, the Division Bench granted interim protection and directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner until the next date of hearing.

The order effectively stays any immediate recovery measures by the GST department, providing temporary relief to the developer while the legality of the demand is examined by the Court.

The Bombay High Court has listed the matter for further hearing on August 3, 2026. Until then, the GST authorities have been restrained from taking coercive recovery measures against the petitioner.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CBI Wildlife Trafficking Case: Mumbai Court Grants Bail Citing Lack of Specific Possession Allegations

The Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted...

Parliamentary Panel Urged to Fill 1,588 Vacant Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Posts in CBIC; SC/ST Association Flags Delay in Reservation Implementation

The All India Income Tax SC/ST Employees Welfare Federation (ITSEWA) has urged the Parliamentary...

Service Tax Demand Quashed as Dept. Fails to Prove Service of SCN: CESTAT 

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 16, 2026.GSTTAXPAYER CAN’T BE PENALISED FOR...

More like this

CBI Wildlife Trafficking Case: Mumbai Court Grants Bail Citing Lack of Specific Possession Allegations

The Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted...

Parliamentary Panel Urged to Fill 1,588 Vacant Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Posts in CBIC; SC/ST Association Flags Delay in Reservation Implementation

The All India Income Tax SC/ST Employees Welfare Federation (ITSEWA) has urged the Parliamentary...

Service Tax Demand Quashed as Dept. Fails to Prove Service of SCN: CESTAT 

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...