HomeGSTNo Interest/Penalty Applicable Due to Retrospective Interpretation of Rule 133(3)(c): GSTAT Confirms...

No Interest/Penalty Applicable Due to Retrospective Interpretation of Rule 133(3)(c): GSTAT Confirms Profiteering of ₹4.57 Lakh

10/12/2025

135

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, has confirmed that Dange Enterprises profiteered an amount of Rs. 4,57,683 during the period 15 November 2017 to 30 June 2019, directing the firm to deposit the entire sum into the Consumer Welfare Funds (CWF) of the Centre and States. The bench of Justice (Retd.)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Income Tax Reassessment Invalid in Absence of Incriminating Material: Delhi HC

J&K High Court Allows Revival of GST Appeals After Pre-Deposit Default; Grants One Final Opportunity to Contest Tax Demands

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.

Most Popular

No Interest/Penalty Applicable Due to Retrospective Interpretation of Rule 133(3)(c): GSTAT Confirms Profiteering of ₹4.57 Lakh

Membership Required

Most Popular

Amendments to SION A-290 for Metformin HCL Production; Changes in Unit of Measurement Take Immediate Effect: DGFT

Delhi HC Directs GST Dept. to Pay Interest After Refund Re-credit Delay Caused by Technical Glitches

Bombay High Court Quashes Stay Order After Finding Tax Authority Wrongly Taxed Gross Receipts Instead of Income

GST Transition Rule Cannot Override Service Tax Limitation: CESTAT Rejects Mahindra Holidays’ Refund Appeals

Amendments to SION A-290 for Metformin HCL Production; Changes in Unit of Measurement Take Immediate Effect: DGFT

Delhi HC Directs GST Dept. to Pay Interest After Refund Re-credit Delay Caused by Technical Glitches

Bombay High Court Quashes Stay Order After Finding Tax Authority Wrongly Taxed Gross Receipts Instead of Income

No Interest/Penalty Applicable Due to Retrospective Interpretation of Rule 133(3)(c): GSTAT Confirms Profiteering of ₹4.57 Lakh

Membership Required

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular