Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTDelhi High Court Quashes Retrospective GST Registration Cancellations Citing Lack Of Reasons...

Delhi High Court Quashes Retrospective GST Registration Cancellations Citing Lack Of Reasons In SCN 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has quashes retrospective GST registration cancellations citing lack of reasons in Show Cause Notice (SCN).

The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar observed that absence of reasons having been assigned in the original SCN in support of a proposed retrospective cancellation as well as a failure to place the petitioner on prior notice of such an intent clearly invalidates the GST Registration Cancellation with retrospective effect.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the order pursuant to which the Goods and Services Tax  registration of the writ petitioner has come to be cancelled with retrospective effect from 09 November 2017. 

The petitioner submitted that SCN was duly served, the petitioner does not appear to have filed a response and which led to the passing of the final order dated 20 March 2024.

The petitioner contended that neither the SCN nor the final order alludes to or rests upon any material on the basis of which the respondent would have formed the opinion that Section 29(2)(e) of the Central GST Act, 2017 was violated nor did it embody an intent of a proposed retrospective cancellation of the GST registration of the petitioner.

The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order insofar as it proceeds to cancel the registration of the petitioner from a retrospective date. The respondent/department shall now proceed to adjudicate the SCN afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner. 

Case Details

Case Title: JSD Traders LLP Versus Additional Commissioner, Cgst & Anr.

Case No.: W.P.(C) 2608/2025

Date: 03.03.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Rana Gurtej Singh

Counsel For Respondent: Sushila Narang

Read More: 12% GST On Fruit Pulp, Juice-Based Carbonated Drinks: Gauhati High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...